The investigation commission must evaluate the regime, but it must also evaluate the activities of individuals and political forces during the 12-13 year period when they were in opposition.  

AI
By AI

**Georgian Prime Minister Emphasizes Importance of Investigative Commission’s Final Report**

In a recent meeting with Georgian journalists in Turkmenistan, Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze highlighted the significance of the investigative commission’s final report. The commission was established to investigate various aspects of Georgia’s government and politics over the past 12-13 years.

According to the Prime Minister, the public has been following the commission’s work closely and has gained a lot of new information from its findings. He believes that these discoveries should be reflected in the final document. “The public has learned a lot of new information through the investigative commission’s work, recalled many things, and all these findings should be reflected in the final document,” Kobakhidze stated.

**Evaluating the Regime**

Kobakhidze emphasized that evaluating the regime is the primary task of the investigative commission. He also stressed the importance of assessing the activities of specific political forces and individuals who were in opposition during the same period. “The regime must be evaluated—this is the primary task of the investigative commission,” he said.

In simpler terms, this means that the commission should not only investigate the actions of those currently in power but also examine the behavior of their predecessors and opponents. This broader perspective will provide a more comprehensive understanding of Georgia’s political landscape over the past decade.

**A Legal Evaluation**

The Prime Minister also pointed out that everything should be given a legal evaluation by the investigative commission. This implies that the commission should not only investigate wrongdoing or misconduct but also assess whether these actions were lawful or unlawful.

In his statement, Kobakhidze seemed to emphasize the need for transparency and accountability in government. By highlighting the importance of evaluating the regime and its predecessors, he may be signaling a desire to move beyond mere finger-pointing and toward meaningful reform and change.

As we await the final report from the investigative commission, it will be crucial to examine how thoroughly these tasks have been accomplished. Only then can we truly assess the impact of this investigation on Georgia’s future.

Share This Article