**UK Funding in Georgia: A Week On, No Answers from the British Embassy**
It has been a week since Shalva Papuashvili, a prominent Georgian politician, addressed the British Embassy with a pressing question. He asked them to reveal who and how much they were funding ahead of the 2024 elections. This inquiry was made in light of growing concerns about foreign influence on Georgia’s electoral process.
**Funding Propaganda: A Violation of International Law?**
In his statement, Papuashvili emphasized that today, funding propaganda and extremism in another country is considered a violation of international law. This assertion highlights the gravity of such actions, particularly when they occur in the context of elections. The Georgian politician’s remarks suggest that transparency and accountability are essential to maintaining the integrity of the electoral process.
**The Significance of Disclosure**
Papuashvili’s request for disclosure is not merely a demand for information; it represents an effort to ensure that Georgia’s electoral landscape remains free from undue influence. By seeking clarity on British funding, he underscores the importance of transparency in elections. This stance resonates with global norms, where secrecy around foreign funding can lead to suspicions of interference.
**Implications and Concerns**
The implications of Papuashvili’s inquiry extend beyond Georgia’s borders. The question of how much external influence is permissible on a country’s electoral process has become increasingly relevant in today’s interconnected world. His call for transparency reflects the need for robust safeguards against foreign interference, ensuring that elections remain a true reflection of a nation’s will.
Read More @ www.interpressnews.ge
