**US Officials Weigh in on Russia’s Aggression in Ukraine**
The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine has been a major point of contention for the international community. Recently, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged that Russia is indeed an aggressor in the war-torn country. However, when asked if Russian President Vladimir Putin should be labeled as a war criminal, Rubio declined to do so.
The comments come on the heels of a phone call between US President Donald Trump and Putin, which has left many wondering about the direction of US foreign policy. Democratic Representative Bill Keating pressed Rubio for his stance on the issue, asking if Russia was indeed the aggressor in Ukraine. Rubio’s response was straightforward: “They invaded them, yes.”
When asked specifically about Putin’s involvement in war crimes, Rubio acknowledged that such atrocities have been committed in Ukraine. However, he stopped short of labeling the Russian leader as a war criminal. “War crimes have been committed, no doubt, and who is responsible for that, there will be a time and place for that accountability,” Rubio said during a hearing with the US House Foreign Affairs Committee.
This stance differs from that of US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who has previously labeled Putin as a war criminal. When asked about his views on the matter, Bessent replied: “Yes, I do consider Vladimir Putin a war criminal.” However, when questioned about whether he would negotiate with someone considered a war criminal, Bessent noted that diplomacy often requires engaging with both sides.
**A Divided US Response to Russia’s Aggression**
The differing opinions on Putin’s status as a war criminal reflect the complexities of the situation. While Rubio has acknowledged Russian aggression in Ukraine, his reluctance to label Putin as a war criminal may be seen as a sign of continued diplomatic engagement. On the other hand, Bessent’s more forthright stance reflects a growing awareness within the US government about Russia’s human rights abuses.
As the conflict continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how these differing views will shape US foreign policy towards Ukraine and Russia. One thing is clear: independent journalism like that of Kyiv Independent plays a crucial role in shedding light on this complex situation and providing accurate information to the public.
Read More @ kyivindependent.com
