**TSU March: A Missed Opportunity for Irakli Kupradze’s Party**
In a recent statement, Irakli Kupradze, leader of the Citizens’ Movement party, explained why his party didn’t participate in a major rally held at Tbilisi State University (TSU). The march was focused on supporting the boycott movement, and this main demand led to the absence of Citizen’s Movement.
Kupradze emphasized that despite not attending the TSU rally, his party remains committed to participating in all types of street protests. This stance highlights the complexity of Georgia’s current political landscape, where different parties have varying views on how to address the country’s pressing issues.
**Boycott Movement: A Divisive Issue**
The boycott movement has been a contentious topic in Georgian politics for some time now. While some see it as a necessary step towards bringing about change, others view it as a harmful and counterproductive strategy. The decision by TSU to host the rally reflects this divide, with the university’s administration facing criticism from both sides.
**Citizens’ Movement: A Moderate Voice**
Kupradze’s party has positioned itself as a moderate force in Georgian politics. By choosing not to participate in the TSU march, they are attempting to maintain their independence and avoid taking a stance on an issue that is highly polarizing. This approach may be seen as cautious by some, but it also reflects a desire to engage with other parties and civil society organizations.
**A Shift in Focus?**
The fact that Kupradze’s party was not present at the TSU rally suggests a possible shift in their focus towards more inclusive and collaborative approaches to addressing Georgia’s challenges. By emphasizing participation in all types of street protests, they may be signaling a willingness to engage with a broader range of stakeholders and find common ground on key issues.
Read More @ www.interpressnews.ge
