**Georgian MP Slams European Parliament Deputies Over Interference in Country’s Affairs**
In a strong response to the debates held in the European Parliament regarding Georgia, Georgian Dream MP Irakli Kadagishvili has criticized some deputies for interfering in the country’s internal affairs. The criticism comes as MEPs called for new parliamentary elections to be held in Georgia.
Kadagishvili took issue with the suggestion that new elections should be held simply because the political forces supported by certain groups did not succeed in the polls. He argued that this was an unjust and dishonest way of advancing one’s own political agenda, rather than a genuine concern for democracy in Georgia. “Criticism will be acceptable only if it is based on objective data,” he emphasized.
The MP also accused some political circles of seeking to install a puppet-style administration in Georgia, rather than supporting an independent government. He compared this situation to the aftermath of the 2020 elections, when certain groups allegedly pursued similar goals. “Their goal is not to have an independent Georgian state and government, but to establish a rule that would primarily serve external interests and execute foreign orders,” Kadagishvili concluded.
**A Deeper Look at the Criticism**
Kadagishvili’s comments highlight a deeper concern about the level of interference from external actors in Georgia’s internal affairs. The MP is right to point out that criticism should be based on objective facts, rather than political agendas. In this case, it seems that some MEPs are pushing for new elections without taking into account the country’s electoral laws and procedures.
The accusation that certain groups are seeking to install a puppet-style administration in Georgia also raises questions about the motives behind their actions. Are they truly interested in supporting an independent government, or do they have ulterior motives?
**A Need for Balanced Approach**
In order to address these concerns, there is a need for a balanced approach that takes into account both internal and external perspectives on Georgia’s democratic development. MEPs should engage with the Georgian authorities to understand their electoral laws and procedures before calling for new elections.
At the same time, the Georgian government must also be open to constructive criticism and reform efforts from external actors. This can help to build trust and confidence in the country’s democratic institutions, rather than creating unnecessary tensions and divisions.
Read More @ www.interpressnews.ge
