**UK Court Rejects Appeal to Halt F-35 Parts Export to Israel**
In a recent decision, the UK High Court has dismissed an appeal brought by campaigners who sought to stop the transfer of British-made parts for US-produced F-35 jet fighters to Israel. The court ruled that the government does not have the constitutional authority to withdraw from the defence programme, which could potentially lead to international conflict.
**Background on Arms Export Licenses**
The UK government suspended around 30 arms export licenses to Israel in September last year due to concerns that British-made weapons could be used in the Gaza Strip in violation of international law. The country supplies components to a global F-35 pool that Israel can access, and campaigners argued that this poses a risk to civilians in the region.
**Government’s Argument**
The government maintained that it cannot withdraw from the defence programme without putting international peace at risk. They also claimed that withdrawing from the programme would undermine US confidence in the UK and Nato. The court ultimately agreed with the government’s stance, stating that the decision was a matter for the executive branch of government rather than the courts.
**Reaction from Human Rights Groups**
Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and other organizations expressed their disappointment at the ruling. They argued that the UK has a responsibility to uphold international law and prevent its equipment being used in human rights abuses. The groups pointed out that the conflict in Gaza is a grave humanitarian crisis, with entire families being killed and civilians facing starvation due to a blockade.
**Commentary**
“This judgment does not change the facts on the ground or absolve the UK government of its responsibilities under international law,” said Yasmine Ahmed, the UK director of Human Rights Watch. “The horrific reality in Gaza is unfolding before our eyes, and it’s unconscionable for the government to continue licensing the sales of components for F-35 planes knowing they will be used to intentionally attack civilians.”
**Next Steps**
Lawyers for human rights groups are evaluating whether there are grounds for an appeal. Meanwhile, the government has stated that it will continue to review its export licensing for defence purposes.
Read More @ www.bbc.com
