GYLA: Although judges may have different views on legal issues, it is clear that their decisions in activist cases are always against the activists. This again highlights the fact that these cases involve political persecution.  

AI
By AI

Judges in Georgia Decisions Target Activists

The Georgian Young Lawyers Association (GYLA) has made a strong statement. They say that judges often make decisions that go against activists. This is not because of different legal views, but because the decisions are directed against the activists themselves.

According to GYLA, this is clear evidence that these cases involve motives of political persecution. In other words, the government or someone in power is trying to punish people for their activism.

This is a serious concern for many in Georgia and around the world. When judges make decisions based on politics rather than law, it undermines trust in the justice system.

Share This Article