**Belgrade Court Orders Pro-Regime Tabloid to Retract Story**
The Belgrade Appeals Court has upheld a lower court ruling, ordering the pro-regime tabloid Informer to publish a retraction of a story claiming that N1 justified the killing of Serb children. This latest development marks a significant victory for media freedom and a blow to propaganda efforts.
**Background: The Original Story**
The controversy began in June 2022 when N1 published an article about Danijel Borović, one of the pilots accused of war crimes on Petrovačka Street during Operation Storm in 1995. The article featured statements from Borović himself and provided information about the criminal proceedings against him.
**Facts vs. Propaganda**
Informer, a tabloid known for its pro-regime views, responded with a scathing attack on N1, claiming that the news outlet was justifying the murder of Serb children by publishing the article. However, the court has now ruled that Informer’s story was baseless and defamatory.
**The Retraction Obligation**
As a result of the Appeals Court decision, Informer is required to publish the following retraction:
“It is incorrect that N1 television and the N1info.rs website, by publishing the article ‘Accused pilot for N1: I don’t feel guilty, we did everything honestly in the war’ on June 8, 2022, are justifying the murderers of Serbian children… The truth is that the article published under the title: ‘Accused pilot for N1: I don’t feel guilty, we did everything right in the war’ on June 8, 2022, on the N1info.rs portal contains statements from Danijel Borović… The text does not contain any conclusions from journalists or editors, nor does it take sides with Croatian pilots who are accused of war crimes.”
**Commentary**
This ruling marks a significant step forward for media freedom in Serbia. By forcing Informer to retract its false claims, the court has sent a strong message that propaganda and disinformation will not be tolerated. This decision also highlights the importance of fact-based reporting and the need for news outlets to maintain their independence.
**Analysis**
The implications of this ruling go beyond the specific case at hand. It sets a precedent for future cases where media outlets are accused of spreading false information or engaging in propaganda. In an era where disinformation is increasingly prevalent, courts must take a firm stance against such behavior. By doing so, they can help protect the integrity of journalism and promote a more informed public discourse.
Read More @ n1info.rs
