**NATO’s Annual Report: A Mixed Bag for Georgia**
The latest annual report from NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has been released, and it’s a mixed bag when it comes to Georgia. On the one hand, the report highlights the country’s practical cooperation with the Alliance over the past year, including participation in defense capacity building programs and exercises. On the other hand, the report omits any mention of Georgia’s status as a NATO aspirant or its commitment to eventual membership, which has been a cornerstone of the country’s relations with the Alliance.
The report features Georgia in several sections, such as defense capacity building and institutional reform, but strangely leaves out the section on the Open Door policy. This omission is significant, given that Georgia has long been considered one of NATO’s closest partners and aspiring members. The 2008 Bucharest Summit committed to Georgia’s eventual membership, a promise that has yet to be fulfilled.
Despite the lack of mention, the report highlights Georgia’s participation in various initiatives aimed at strengthening partner capabilities, such as the Building Integrity program and its involvement in the South Caucasus region. However, this focus on practical cooperation comes at the expense of discussing Georgia’s future membership prospects, which is a significant aspect of the country’s relations with NATO.
The report also notes that Georgia has been one of eight partners benefiting from tailored assistance aimed at strengthening defense and security capacities. Since 2014, Allies and partners have donated nearly EUR 88 million to recipient partner states, including Georgia, toward this initiative. However, this achievement is overshadowed by the omission of any mention of NATO’s commitment to Georgia’s membership.
**A Missed Opportunity?**
The absence of language on Georgia’s membership prospects in the latest Secretary General’s report is a notable departure from previous reports. Last year’s report referred to Georgia as “one of NATO’s closest partners” and “an aspiring member of the Alliance.” The 2022 report even mentioned the political commitment to Georgia’s NATO membership, stating that Allies remain committed to supporting the eventual NATO membership of Georgia and Ukraine.
This omission is significant, given the current geopolitical climate and Russia’s ongoing aggression in the region. It’s a missed opportunity for NATO to reaffirm its commitment to Georgia’s membership prospects and to send a strong message to Moscow about the Alliance’s support for democratic values and territorial integrity.
**What Does This Mean?**
The lack of mention of Georgia’s membership prospects in the latest Secretary General’s report raises more questions than it answers. Is this a sign that NATO is reevaluating its commitment to Georgia’s membership? Or is it simply a case of bureaucratic oversight?
One thing is certain, however: the omission of any mention of Georgia’s membership prospects in the latest report is a missed opportunity for NATO to reaffirm its commitment to the country’s democratic values and territorial integrity. As we look ahead to a new era of geopolitical challenges, it’s more important than ever that NATO maintains its commitment to supporting democratic partners like Georgia.
Read More @ civil.ge
