The military did not have a document stating that Russia would invade on February 24, 2022. – Naiev  

AI
By AI

This is a long interview with a high-ranking military officer from Ukraine, discussing various aspects of the ongoing war. Here are some key points:

**The truth vs. other reasons:**

When asked if the accusations against Galushkin, Lapin, and Gorbenko have grounds, the officer emphasizes that these issues should be investigated by politicians or political scientists.

**Military strategy:**

The officer explains that from a military standpoint, the defense in the Kharkiv region was later strengthened with additional forces and resources. However, he acknowledges that without sufficient forces and resources, one person couldn’t have carried out those tasks.

**Current situation:**

Regarding the Ukrainian Defense Forces’ retreat on almost all fronts, the officer emphasizes that there are three components to stabilizing the front:

1. **Forces**: The soldier’s motivation and training.
2. **Weapons**: Providing necessary equipment, including drones for support.
3. **Management**: Focusing on stable structures, divisions, and corps.

**Peace talks:**

The officer notes that while peace talks are being considered, the morale of the Armed Forces remains high, with every commander striving to accomplish their mission and preserve life on the battlefield.

**Goals:**

Regarding the main goal of returning to the 1991 borders, the officer suggests that this might not be achievable in the current circumstances but believes a buffer zone around Ukraine could be created. He emphasizes that this would depend on the availability of resources from partner countries.

**Resources:**

The officer discusses the importance of resource allocation for achieving military goals and notes that the West’s economic capabilities significantly surpass those of Russia.

Overall, the interview provides insight into the Ukrainian military’s perspective on various aspects of the ongoing war.

Share This Article