The article discusses the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and how it differs from previous conflicts such as Afghanistan and South Vietnam. The author argues that while there are similarities between these conflicts, the will to fight on the part of the Ukrainian people sets them apart.
The article also highlights the importance of Western support for Ukraine, citing examples of how America’s involvement in past conflicts has been marked by a lack of trust between allies and coalition partners. The author warns that if the West fails to provide reliable support, it could lead to domestic political instability within Ukraine and undermine international law and democracy.
Furthermore, the article critiques Trump’s approach to foreign policy, arguing that his actions have changed America’s image abroad from “liberator” to “great disruptor” and “landlord seeking rent.” This shift is seen as undermining principles of sovereignty and mutual benefit, which could lead to a new arms race and conflict in Africa.
Ultimately, the article suggests that if Ukraine falls under Russian control, it would imperil Western values such as democracy, liberal policy, and personal freedom. The author concludes that Trump’s actions (or inaction) would place him on the wrong side of history.
The main points of the article are:
* The conflict in Ukraine is different from previous conflicts due to the Ukrainian people’s will to fight.
* Western support for Ukraine is crucial, but may be unreliable due to America’s past behavior in Afghanistan and South Vietnam.
* Trump’s approach to foreign policy has changed America’s image abroad, undermining principles of sovereignty and mutual benefit.
* If Ukraine falls under Russian control, it would imperil Western values such as democracy and personal freedom.
* Trump’s actions (or inaction) could place him on the wrong side of history.
