Minister: Lawyers are missing the point about Palestinian recognition  

AI
By AI

**UK Trade Secretary Defends Palestinian Recognition Plans**

The UK’s plans to recognize a Palestinian state have sparked controversy, with some lawyers warning that it could breach international law. However, Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has said that these warnings are “missing the point”.

According to Reuters, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has announced that the UK will move towards recognition unless Israel meets certain conditions, including agreeing a ceasefire and reviving the prospect of a two-state solution. This comes after Canada recognized Palestine as an independent state earlier this month.

However, some of Britain’s most distinguished lawyers have expressed concerns that Palestine does not meet the legal requirements for statehood under a 1933 treaty. They argue that there is uncertainty over the borders of Palestine and that Fatah and Hamas are enemies who cannot enter into relationships with other countries.

Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds defended the plans in an interview, saying that the goal was “not only a ceasefire in Gaza, but a true peace process which requires a two-state solution”. He emphasized that the UK will not negotiate with Hamas, which is considered a terrorist organization.

This move by the UK follows similar decisions by France and Canada to recognize Palestine as an independent state. The Palestinian Authority, which runs parts of the occupied West Bank, must commit to “much-needed reform” for recognition, according to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. He also stated that Hamas can play no part in a future Palestinian government.

**The Debate Over International Law**

The question of international law has been repeatedly raised with the prime minister by more than 800 lawyers, who allege Israel has flouted the Geneva Convention by committing war crimes including genocide in Gaza. These concerns have sparked a heated debate over whether Palestine meets the legal requirements for statehood under the 1933 treaty.

While some experts argue that the UK’s recognition of Palestine could set a precedent and potentially lead to other countries following suit, others believe that it is a necessary step towards a lasting peace in the region.

**A Shift in Diplomatic Approach**

The UK’s move towards recognizing Palestine marks a significant shift in diplomatic approach, with the country breaking away from its traditional ally, Israel. This decision has been met with criticism from some quarters, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who claimed that it “rewards Hamas’s monstrous terrorism”.

However, Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds remains steadfast in his defense of the UK’s plans, saying that they are not about recognizing Palestine as a state per se, but rather about achieving a lasting peace in the region. As he emphasized, “We have been very clear. It’s our long-standing position that hostages must be released. It is also our long-standing position that Hamas cannot play a role in the future administration of Gaza or any Palestinian State.”

Read More @ www.bbc.com

Share This Article