**Ukraine Misses Chance to Appoint Anti-Graft Bureau Head as IMF Deadline Looms**
The Ukrainian government has once again failed to appoint Oleksandr Tsyvinsky, a seasoned anti-corruption investigator, as the head of the Bureau of Economic Security (BEB). This latest development comes just a day before the International Monetary Fund’s deadline for the appointment of a new BEB head expired.
Tsyvinsky was chosen by an independent commission in June, despite opposition from Ukrainian representatives. The commission’s international members unanimously backed his nomination, citing his expertise and experience in investigating economic crimes. However, the Cabinet of Ministers has refused to approve Tsyvinsky’s appointment twice this month, sparking criticism from civic watchdogs and international partners.
The BEB was created in 2021 to investigate economic crimes, but it has long faced accusations of corruption and political meddling. Reforming the agency is a critical component of Ukraine’s commitments to both the IMF and the European Union. The IMF had initially set a deadline for Tsyvinsky’s appointment in February 2025, which was later extended to the end of July.
**Why Did Ukraine Miss the Deadline?**
So, why did Ukraine miss this crucial opportunity to appoint Tsyvinsky as the head of the BEB? Many believe that President Volodymyr Zelensky’s Office views Tsyvinsky as too independent. This is a worrying sign for those who have been pushing for reforms in Ukraine.
Tsyvinsky has an impressive track record, having investigated illegal land seizure schemes in Kyiv and holding clearance for state secrets. He was selected by the independent commission after passing special vetting. Despite his qualifications, Tsyvinsky’s candidacy was rejected not on security grounds, but due to perceived opposition from President Zelensky’s Office.
**What Does This Mean for Ukraine?**
Ukraine’s failure to appoint a capable and independent head of the BEB is a significant setback for the country’s efforts to combat corruption and implement reforms. The move has drawn criticism from international partners, who have warned that repeated delays and apparent political interference in the process could undermine Ukraine’s credibility.
As Transparency and anti-corruption groups point out, Tsyvinsky’s selection was seen as an opportunity to reset the BEB’s tarnished reputation and align its leadership with EU-backed reforms. The IMF has been patient, but the lack of progress on this front is starting to raise concerns about Ukraine’s commitment to reform.
**What’s Next?**
The clock is ticking for Ukraine to get its house in order. The country needs to demonstrate a genuine commitment to reforming institutions like the BEB and appointing capable leaders who are free from undue influence. Anything less will only undermine confidence in Ukraine’s ability to tackle corruption and implement meaningful reforms.
Read More @ kyivindependent.com
