**Video Evidence in Zviad Tsetskhladze Case Falls Apart**
A high-profile case in Georgia has taken a dramatic turn, with the defense team raising serious questions about the validity of key evidence. Zviad Tsetskhladze, accused of organizing and participating in group violence during protests, is facing potential prison sentences ranging from 6 to 9 years.
However, according to lawyer Elguja Avsajanishvili, the prosecution’s case relies heavily on a 14-minute video that supposedly contains incriminating verbal content. But here’s the catch: the video has no sound. Yes, you read that right – a video used as evidence in a serious crime case has been rendered useless by its own silence.
Avsajanishvili made this point clear during today’s hearing, stating that such a video cannot be considered valid evidence in the case. He also accused the prosecution of falsifying evidence, claiming that they had tried to present a video with sound but were forced to admit that it was indeed silent.
**Witness Testifies Against Prosecution**
A witness, investigator Levan Basiladze, who reviewed the seized video footage, surprisingly testified against the prosecution’s version. Despite initially stating that there was sound in the video, he later corrected himself and confirmed that there is no audio in the video. This bombshell revelation has left many questioning the integrity of the case.
**Commentary**
The silence of this video raises serious concerns about the fairness and transparency of the trial process. If a key piece of evidence cannot be used due to its own limitations, then how can justice be served? It’s like trying to build a case on shaky ground.
Avsajanishvili’s accusation that the prosecution is falsifying evidence also warrants close scrutiny. In any court of law, evidence must be presented in its original form, without tampering or manipulation. The fact that the prosecution was forced to admit their mistake only adds to the suspicion.
**What’s Next?**
The trial continues, with Zviad Tsetskhladze and his co-defendants facing serious charges. However, with the video evidence rendered useless, one wonders how the prosecution will proceed. Will they rely on other evidence that might be equally flawed? Or will they re-examine their case and present new information?
Only time will tell. But for now, it’s clear that this case has taken a dramatic turn, with questions being raised about the integrity of the trial process.
Read More @ www.interpressnews.ge
