**Judge Accused of Pre-Determining Verdict in Georgian Politician’s Trial**
In a shocking turn of events, the lawyer for Saba Jikia, a high-profile politician, has made some explosive allegations against Tamar Mchedlishvili, a judge involved in her client’s trial. According to them, Judge Mchedlishvili took significantly longer to explain the written text than she did to go into the deliberation room with other judges. This, they claim, suggests that she had already made up her mind before even discussing it with her colleagues.
**Implications of Pre-Determining a Verdict**
The implications of such an accusation are serious and far-reaching. If true, this would mean that Judge Mchedlishvili’s verdict was pre-determined, rather than being the result of a fair and impartial deliberation process. This could potentially taint not just Saba Jikia’s trial, but the entire justice system.
**Commentary**
In an interview, the lawyer for Saba Jikia said that they witnessed Judge Mchedlishvili taking more time to explain the written text than she did to go into the deliberation room. This raises serious questions about her impartiality and whether she allowed personal biases to influence her verdict. The fact that this is being alleged in a high-profile trial only adds fuel to the fire.
**What’s Next?**
The allegations against Judge Mchedlishvili are likely to spark a significant backlash, with many calling for an investigation into the matter. The reputation of the Georgian justice system hangs in the balance, and it remains to be seen how this will play out. One thing is certain: this case will continue to make headlines for weeks to come.
Read More @ www.interpressnews.ge
