**Judge in Nika Gvaramia Case Has a Troubling Past**
In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that the judge presiding over the case of Nika Gvaramia, the director-general of Rustavi 2 TV, has a prior conviction for official negligence. This news raises serious questions about the impartiality and integrity of the judicial process.
According to Dimitri Sadzaglishvili, who made this revelation, the judge in question was convicted nearly 20 years ago. It’s hard not to wonder if this individual is being handpicked by the very same system he is supposed to be overseeing.
The fact that someone with such a checkered past has been chosen to preside over a high-profile case like Nika Gvaramia’s raises eyebrows. One would expect judges to be above reproach, especially when it comes to sensitive cases involving prominent individuals and institutions.
**What Does This Mean for the Case?**
The implications of this revelation are far-reaching. If the judge in question has a prior conviction, it casts a shadow over the entire trial process. Can we trust that justice will be served if someone with such a history is making key decisions?
It’s not just about Nika Gvaramia’s case; this raises broader concerns about the state of Georgia’s judiciary and its commitment to fairness and transparency.
**A Call for Accountability**
As the situation unfolds, it’s essential that those in positions of authority take immediate action. This includes investigating the judge’s past conviction and taking steps to ensure that such a miscarriage of justice is not repeated in the future.
The public has a right to know that their judiciary is working honestly and transparently. It’s time for Georgia’s leaders to step up and address these concerns head-on.
Read More @ www.interpressnews.ge
